Jon’s thought processes on this and why he created the visualization he created are noted below.
What do you think of this visualization and as Jon asks: What do you see in the data?
Another Way of Looking at Graduation Rates
Jon saw an article in his Facebook feed about college ROI, although it was called the 50 Best Private Colleges for Earning Your Degree on Time. As is often the case, there was nothing really wrong with the facts of that article: You see a nice little table showing the 50 Colleges with the highest graduation rate.
But it got Jon thinking: What if high graduation rate wasn’t enough? What if a considerable portion of your freshman class that graduates takes longer than four years to do so? Is that a good deal? He then created some hypotheticals:
College A: 1000 freshmen, 800 who graduate within four years, 900 who graduate in five, and 950 who graduate in six. So the four-, five-, and six-year graduation rates are 80%, 90%, and 95%. But of the 950 who eventually graduate, only 84.2% do so in four years.
College B: 1000 freshmen, 750 who graduate within four years, 775 who graduate in five, and 800 who graduate in six. So the four-, five-, and six-year graduation rates are 75%, 77.5%, and 80%. Thus, of the 800 who eventually graduate, almost 94% do so in four years.
College C: 1000 freshmen, 550 who graduate within four years, 600 who graduate in five, and 625 who graduate in six. So the four-, five-, and six-year graduation rates are 55%, 60%, and 62.5%. Of the 625 who eventually graduate, 88% do so in four years.
If you were choosing among these three colleges, which might you choose? The easy money says you go with College A, the one with the highest graduation rate. College B would be your second choice, and C would be your third. But what if you are absolutely, positively certain you’ll graduate from the college you choose? College B is first, then College C, then College A.
Data can be tricky. Jon has noted many times in the past that things like graduation rates are really almost inputs, not outputs: If you choose wealthy, well-educated students, you’re going to have higher graduation rates. It’s a classic case of making a silk purse out of, well, silk.
Jon tried to demonstrate this in the visualization he created below, and he likes the simplicity here. Each dot is a college (hover over it for details). They’re in boxes based on the average freshman ACT score across the top, and the percentage of students with Pell along the side. The dots are colored by four-year graduation rates, and you should see right away the pattern that emerges. Red dots (top right) tend to be selective colleges with fewer poor students.
But if you want to look at the chance a graduate will finish in four years, use the filter at the bottom right. Find a number you like, pull the left slider up to it, and see who remains. (Just a note: Jon is a little suspicious of any number of 100% on this scale, which would mean absolutely no students who graduate take longer than four years to do so. It might be true, but it’s hard to believe. But he would set the right slider to 99% at the most.) Jon points out to remember there is a lot of bad IPEDS data out there, so don’t place any bar bets on what you see here.
What do you see? Click on the image below and find out.